Competition Appeal Tribunal refuses to order anti-avoidance endorsement to ATE policy in Which? smartphone proceedings
Posted by Simon Manuel
Harbour Underwriting
The Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) has granted Which? permission to proceed with its collective proceedings on behalf of 29 million smartphone buyers against technology giant Qualcomm. In doing so, it refused to order Which? to add an anti-avoidance endorsement to its After the Event (ATE) policy despite Qualcomm’s request to do so, saying an amendment […]